* The majority of research results cannot be reproduced due to lack of underlying data, process instructions and context information.
* Adequate contextual information is often missing, making it difficult to determine whether a piece of research is credible and can be built upon.
* Evaluation by peer review has a mighty filtering function but is often untransparent and potentially biased.
* There has been a rise in retractions as a result of flawed practices, as well as (un)conscious wrongdoing.
Deficits of the Current Scholarly Communication System:
Kraker, P., Dörler, D., Ferus, A., Gutounig, R., Heigl, F., Kaier, C., … Wandl-Vogt, E. (2016, June 15). The Vienna Principles: A Vision for Scholarly Communication in the 21st Century. Zenodo. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.55597